mirror of
https://github.com/PabloMK7/citra.git
synced 2024-11-30 03:10:16 +00:00
Pica/TextureEnvironment: Treat texture combiner source 1 as the PrimaryColor.
Not really sure where the difference is, but some applications seem to use this 1:1 the same way...
This commit is contained in:
parent
04cd06d5c2
commit
e11fb96408
2 changed files with 4 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -224,6 +224,8 @@ struct Regs {
|
||||||
struct TevStageConfig {
|
struct TevStageConfig {
|
||||||
enum class Source : u32 {
|
enum class Source : u32 {
|
||||||
PrimaryColor = 0x0,
|
PrimaryColor = 0x0,
|
||||||
|
PrimaryFragmentColor = 0x1,
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Texture0 = 0x3,
|
Texture0 = 0x3,
|
||||||
Texture1 = 0x4,
|
Texture1 = 0x4,
|
||||||
Texture2 = 0x5,
|
Texture2 = 0x5,
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -303,7 +303,9 @@ static void ProcessTriangleInternal(const VertexShader::OutputVertex& v0,
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
auto GetSource = [&](Source source) -> Math::Vec4<u8> {
|
auto GetSource = [&](Source source) -> Math::Vec4<u8> {
|
||||||
switch (source) {
|
switch (source) {
|
||||||
|
// TODO: What's the difference between these two?
|
||||||
case Source::PrimaryColor:
|
case Source::PrimaryColor:
|
||||||
|
case Source::PrimaryFragmentColor:
|
||||||
return primary_color;
|
return primary_color;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
case Source::Texture0:
|
case Source::Texture0:
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue